Cameras in the Courtroom


Case Type:

Hypothetical.

Exigence:

It is the year 2001. John Smith is on trial in a federal court for his attempt to set off a homemade nuclear device. Although his bomb did not reach critical mass, radiation from the "fizzle" he produced has already killed several thousand people in Kansas City. There is some evidence that Smith intended to explode his bomb as a protest against what he saw as the dismantling of the Social Security system.

The Universal Broadcast Network (UBN) files a request with the trial court to place a television camera in the courtroom. The camera will be small, be placed in an inconspicuous location, will be operated remotely and so on. Attorneys for both Smith and the U.S. object. The trial judge issues an order barring television and all other cameras from the courtroom. UBN appeals; the case is now pending before the Supreme Court.



Audience:

The U.S. Supreme Court

Possible
Constraints:

Sheppard v. Maxwell , Shiffrin & Choper 365
Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart , Shiffrin & Choper 366
Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, Shiffrin & Choper 374

Decision:

Up to you.

Related
issues:

Harm to individuals
Broadcast media
Print press


Notes:

Used for a class exercise in Comm Studies C30.


For help
with these categories.

Copyright © 1997 Jean Goodwin. All rights reserved.
jeangoodwin@nwu.edu
Last updated 28 October 1997
The Free Speech website,
http://faculty-web.at.nwu.edu/commstud/freespeech/
.
Free Speech Home